Контекст внутрішньої перелінковки
Сканує сайт, зіставляє з даними GSC і будує карту конкретних дій: яке посилання додати першим, з якої сторінки, куди вести і яким анкором.
| URL | Inlinks i | Clicks i | Impr. i | Pos. i |
|---|
Чим це відрізняється від звичайного краулера
A regular crawler answers "which links exist." Internal Link Context answers "which links should be added first." The difference is prioritization: GSC separates technical noise from pages that already have search demand.
Standard approach: crawl, get a 3,000-row table, don't know where to start. Here: every opportunity has a numeric score, impact level (high/medium/low), and a specific explanation of why that link pair matters more than others.
The tool is especially useful for sites with existing organic traffic — it finds pages ranking at positions 4–20 that are under-supported by internal PageRank and could move up from a few linking fixes.
Як читати результати
Priority opportunities (impact: High). These are donor→target pairs with the highest potential impact. Start here: add a link from the listed donor page to the target page using the suggested anchor or a variation.
Pages with no internal links. Pages with GSC impressions that the crawler found no internal links to. These are isolated pages — PageRank doesn't flow to them and Google indexes them poorly. Add at least 2–3 links from topically related pages.
Weak anchors. Anchors like "read more", "click here", or "details" pass zero topical context to search engines. Replace them with a phrase describing the target page's topic — the suggestion is already provided in the "Replace with" column.
Without GSC. If you're not logged in, the tool shows link structure but cannot calculate SEO potential. Connecting GSC is the most important step for getting actionable recommendations.
Часті запитання
Does it need a paid API?
Why the 300-page limit?
What is a "page with no internal links"?
How do I quickly apply the recommendations?
Does it work with Tilda, WordPress, Shopify?
Наступний крок